Are Grey Knights really changing the entire game of 40k, folks? I mean seriously, they aren't that bad. There are a few armies who seriously will just struggle (sorry Nids), but let's face it. GW has done a fairly good job of keeping the game balanced. If you don't believe me, take a look at 7th edition WFB for a look at unbalanced. We have it made folks. Now take a minute to stop crying, change your underpants, and relax.
2 comments:
With new armies it seem like so many people fall into one two camps...
Those who fear the new army because they think it will be too powerfull, the Sky is Falling crowd.
And, those who want to play it for the same reason mentioned above.
It's nice to see some people are able to see past the shiny and the new!
Thanks for the comment. I think people fail to realize that if GW didn't change things on a cyclical basis, the game would stagnate. But, I don't see codex creep like some claim there is. I see a difference in editions and how books are written around core rules mechanics. Heaven forbid that someone should cry broken when Necrons come out next.
Post a Comment